icon icon

00h UTC; MONDAY, 29 OCTOBER 2012: First off, some Appy Polly Loggies for those of you as had problems with LinkReferral.com this afterlunch (American time), either accessing this site or performing your duties in furtherance thereof; as per usual, they don't offer any sort of due and proper explanation for any planned server outages or powerdowns, and about the only way you learn about such is if your site loads slower than usual thanks to LinkReferral-related iconography being unable to download ... and/or get an error message in your browser of the "Connexion timed out" sort.

Nonetheless, in hoping to improve the traffic numbers (or try to, at any rate), Your Correspondent has decided to resort to backlinker services to see if it helps; just click on the apropos links off to the side of the page and see for yourself how it works.

Something for the "AmeriKKKa Should Be More Like China" crowd to ponder in these the waning days of the Indecision 2012 campaign, by way of Worldcrunch.com, ultimately via Yan Yeng with the Hong Kong-based Economic Observer (as originally published same in Chinese), about how China uses the patsy of "national interest" to excuse repressive measures as deemed necessary:
In response to a letter sent by a women’s rights NGO regarding quota on enrollment of women in certain colleges and universities, China’s Education Ministry said that this restriction was based on “considerations of national interest.”

The officials probably thought they would subdue any unruly voices with such a pompous answer. However, they are wrong. It has actually provoked even more debate as to what constitutes national interest, and what kind of national interests should take precedence over individual freedom?

Whether or not it is all right to impose gender quotas for certain professions, it is clearly ill-conceived for the Education Ministry to say it is on grounds of national interest. This shows that the officials still believe in the “state is supreme” value system and that the simple evocation of national interest is sufficient reason to reject any demand for individual rights.

Such a value system has been the norm throughout China’s history. There are multiple examples where personal interest has had to give way to macro interests. For instance, in the early days of Communist China, for the sake of an “industrial nation,” farmers were forced to accept the unequal exchange of their agricultural products for industrial goods.

The result of this self-sacrifice is that the toiling peasants stayed poor. In the mid-1950s, to promote “orderly cities” as the national interest, the government introduced a series of policies to dissuade, restrict and prohibit the free movement of farmers. The farmers were being forced to stay in the fields without being able to share in the country’s welfare.

During the Cultural Revolution, the whole of society came to a standstill. In the national interest of a “stable society,” tens of millions of young intellectuals were forced out of schools and jobs and dispatched to remote rural areas. This led to countless tragedies.

In that era, policy-makers took it for granted that the public would accept the decisions. This was because when the country was building the “new China,” there was the communist notion of “the smaller me should obey the greater me”. It was unquestionable that for the overall objectives of the nation, we should make personal and collective sacrifices for the “greater good.” If an individual were to go against the country, it would be like an egg against a wall, destined to lose.

However, after 30 years of reform and opening-up, China’s context is very different. When officials raise “national interests” as an excuse, the public starts to get unruly, to ask questions. This is progress for society. In comparison with following blindly and being too afraid to speak up, people have started thinking about the relationship between the state and an individual. They are now able to express their thoughts.

Questions for a young democracy

What is a nation? And what are “national interests”? Can we use them to violate human rights, or to preempt individual choices? These are all issues to be thought about for a country that wants to grow into a modern democratic state with the rule of law.

As economist Milton Friedman wrote in 1962, “To the free man, the country is the collection of individuals who compose it, not something over and above them.”

“The free man will ask neither what his country can do for him nor what he can do for his country. He will ask rather ‘What can I and my compatriots do through government to help us discharge our individual responsibilities, to achieve our several goals and purposes?’”

This shows that the value of a country is to serve its citizens in their search for happiness and service. When this relationship is clarified, it is not difficult to see that national interests should be consistent with personal interests. This is what Milton Friedman means when he writes that the free man “recognizes no national goal except as it is the consensus of the goals that the citizens severally serve. He recognizes no national purpose except as it is the consensus of the purposes for which the citizens severally strive.”

A country should give its citizens the right of free choice, instead of using the national interest as an excuse to limit the rights of its citizens. Citizens know they are owed these rights. They are neither cynical nor indignant.

Compared with 30 years ago, China has made great progress in respecting human rights. Nevertheless, the mentality in which the national interest is placed above personal interests is still the norm.

Two thousand years ago, the Chinese philosopher Mencius said that common people come first, then the state, and then the rulers. This is how human rights, sovereignty and political power should be exercised.

The once-existing value system that “the state is supreme” put the cart before the horse. During the revolution, it might have been used as a last resort, but this value system needs to be changed now that a modern state has been established. For this value system hides a great danger: the danger of an all-powerful state apparatus that can easily turn into a monster used to manipulate individuals and quash human rights in the name of supremacy.
The which may want to be worth pondering in the context of the GOP's Grand Delusion in Indecision 2012 as insists that, for one, ekonomesie vryheid met Amerikaanse eienskappe is somehow mutually intertwined with Our National Character and Identity as a Sovereign Peculiar so that the defence of one is seen as that of the other in case of attack or threat thereto. That, and GOP Presidential wannabe Mitt Romney's rather tactless comment about Jeep seeking to move all production to China when, in fact, it's now emerging that his involvement with Bain Capital Partners has revealed a pattern of bleeding the companies they invested in dry under the banner of "rescue" and "profitability," eventually leaving many thousands of once-proud workers at the mercy of swindlers and scam operatives promising big-big money by working online ("the 30-Second Commute," as it were).

And as if the threat of back-room "dirty tricks" to manipulate Indecision 2012 so as to undermine the free will of the Volk wasn't bad enough, we shouldn't hesitate to keep close watch-and-ward for such tactics so suggesting, especially where vulnerable sub-populations are the target. Especially on Election Day, when it pays to keep handy the freecall number 1-866-OUR-VOTE to report any such you come across. Stand up to such who insists that a mythic "Street Code" based on unwritten tradition or other delusional measures about silence being necessary "to protect jobs" or suchlike Mickey Mouse (especially of the "whose-bread-I-eat-his-song-I-sing" sort) trumps common sense and Liberty. "Liberty is not safe where the people are not watchful."

In closing, Your Correspondent stands with such being afflicted by the potentially adverse and destructive effects of the hybrid of Hurricane Sandy and on-shore storm systems in the Northeastern United States, many of which are in evacuation shelters. And besides, we can do without especially Elmer Gantryite extrapolative excess about such being Divine Warning Upon Our Dear Lovely Nation to either Make the "Correct" Electoral Decisions (i.e., RepubliKKKan) or Yahweh God will withdraw His Protective Hand (the same, it turns out, as the Invisible Hand of the Marketplace) from Our Dear Lovely Nation Within Measurable Distance.


FYI: Your comments on, and responsible sharing of, these posts are always welcome and apprecitated. And if you like these posts, please join my (howbeit sporadic) e-mail list (after replying to the confirmation e-mail beforehand) for insight and observations as may come across Your Correspondent's mind (which you can always leave at any time); to contact me, please do so through the feedback form at the bottom of this page.

Be sure to also check out The Online Mall That Am!, your "one-stop" source that's Open All Hours (Teh Innerwebz, you know) for your beautiful and practical life ... as well as our Online Boutique (as it were), featuring T-shirts, swag, &c., with this blog's logotype or QR codes for your beautiful time and living; both pledging 9.11% of Your Correspondent's commission from your purchases towards reducing America's National Debt.

Please be aware that Your Correspondent has no control over the content of outside links in these posts, which are provided solely for your information and enlightenment; additionally, reference to brand names, products or services in blog posts does not necessarily imply endorsement or approval by Your Correspondent as opposed to enhancing editorial clarity or meaning.

To share this post (responsibly, know) in e-mail or social networks, click the following button and follow the prompts:


If you're a blogger yourself, click here, here (especially if you're on Twitter) and/or here to discover fresh and at once fascinating ways to help stimulate blog traffic.

You can also receive these posts optimised for the Amazon Kindle Reader by subscription, for only US$0.99/month (with 30-day "test drive" available to see if it agrees with you beforehand). And with the Festive Season approaching, please to check out my Holiday Wish List of gifts I could use and appreciate greatly.


free web site traffic and promotion