iconicon


18h UTC; TUESDAY, 29 OCTOBER 2013: Out of an interest in getting especially the more hard-wired specimens of American conservative thought politically to let Facts be known unto a candid world, as well as the lights known as the Naked Truth, Your Correspondent feels it best to bring up these Rather Inconvenient Questions to conservative-tending politicans in open and candid form.

The better, it may be hoped, so that Real Americans (let alone the prolefeed simulation conservative prolefeed conduits love trotting out on occasion) can share this post with especially such specimens of conservative politicos as represent them and their (supposed) "best interests", whereby answers may hopefully be generated. And, if need be, challenged.

Let's proceed, shall we?
  1. Where exactly do you get the notion that free-enterprise capitalism--er, "economic freedom"--is best equipped to perform the functions of otherwise non-essential Government agencies, institutions and schemes? Have you any actual, documented instances to demonstrate this argument in the here-and-now?
  2. In your insistence that industry is best capable of regulating itself, can you provide any documented instances of specific industrial sectors whose self-regulatory codes (based, we may presume, on Best Practices) have been given "safe harbour" by the Federal Trade Commission? (As in recognising the importance of competition and innovation as essential to a healthy market economy, rather than cartel behaviour and its byproducts.)
  3. How exactly do you see free-market capitalism--er, "economic freedom"--to be "people-centred" all the more, with particular attention on the socioeconomically-marginalised that your kind otherwise sees as "chronically dependent upon government" (or, as need be, using cruder terms like "moochers," "leeches," "parasites," "toilet-licking maggots" and worse)?
  4. In your insistence that the working-classes are best equipped to make their own choices towards their retirement planning, are you not aware that many are incapable of making wise investment decisions on their own, thus subjecting them to high-pressure sales tactics vis-a-vis potentially unsound or otherwise inapproriate investment products?
  5. Staying with the preceding point, are you not aware that many of the working classes such as you insist would actually "benefit" from a denationalised Latinoamericano model of Social Security don't exactly know how the equities markets as are integral thereto operate beyond latent anti-Semitic canards about Jews having a supposed "unhealthy and disproportionate dominance" over Wall Street and The City?
  6. How exactly do you see free-trade policies with developing countries to be the "new wave" for American foreign development aid, especially should you seek to avoid charges from targeted countries of "perpetuating colonialism" or otherwise calling to mind what Japan called "Co-Prosperity" (as in what they saw as the "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" prior to World War II, replete with what turned out being trade and development policies as were unfairly biased towards Japan and its zaibatsu cartels at the expense of its imperial designs in East Asia)?
  7. Are you insisting on a Constitutional Amendment establishing, as it were, the "mere formality of legal recognition" of an implied interconnexion between free-market capitalism and Our National Character and Identity as a Peculiar Among the Nations? And by "nation," do you base this on the Christian Nationalist concept holding that "every Nation is founded upon a Country (Landsbodem; i.e., "blood land") allocated unto it by God"?
  8. Have you any evidence of overt "liberal bias and manipulation" of print, broadcast or inline media, or what otherwise prevents your showing it at this time?
  9. Do you have actual, documentary evidence, as can be independently verified, of overt and willful "persecution of Bible-Believing Christians" in the developed Western world in the here-and-now, or of pending campaigns by State authority to so persecute Christians?
  10. How exactly do you expect a Christian Nationalist Homeschooling syllabus emphasising an idealised "Traditional Values" agenda over core skills (cf. apartheid South Africa's Christian National Education syllabus) to help reclaim American economic and industrial might and prosperity through parroting carefully-scripted bumper-sticker slogans, singing ideologically-manipulated hymns, &c., &c.?
  11. In your opposition to abortion, contraception and family planning as being "contrary to Natural Law," are you not aware of what happened to Romania's Communist regime under Nicolae Ceausescu as a direct byproduct of such policies from said regime, never mind that Bucharest's desire in same was one of "hastening the Final Achievement and Perfection of Pure Socialism" at any cost?
  12. Is your real agenda vis-a-vis the National Debt motivated by purely poilitical or ideological motives as can best be described as a "do-nothing" such?
  13. How sure are you that reinstating "sound money" policies based on abolition of the Federal Reserve, reinstatement of the gold standard per pre-1933 policies and returning certain monetary policies to the Treasury actually "control inflation" and "encourage industry, self-reliance, personal responsibility and thrift"?
  14. Is your ideal for a "defining AmeriKKKan culture" one which sees the so-called "music shows" of Branson, MO the litmus test therefor? (Especially where said shows contain subtle conservative propaganda messages disguised to avoid attracting unwelcome suspicions.)
  15. Since when exactly was it necessary to give the military socioeconomic priority at the expense of the poor, undereducated and easily-influenced, and their need for socioeconomic empowerment?
  16. In seeking to save the Lower Classes from themselves, is your ideal essentially one modelled on that of the Proceedings of the First People's Economic Congress, as convened under auspices of the Afrikaner Broederbond and affiliated entities at Bloemfontein, South Africa in October 1939, calling as they did for the channelling and mobilisation of ethno-national unity and solidarity (in the Afrikaans, Volkseenheid) into a "mighty and Christian Nationalist" mass movement based on the concept of Reddingsdaad ("rescue action") expected to channel otherwise "idle monies" of the masses into "productive capital" through the agency of a Reddingsdaadfonds ("Rescue Action Fund") essentially structured as a "social responsibility" exercise of major Wall Street banks and brokerage houses coerced into so participating?
  17. Where exactly do you get the notion that National Interest requires our complacent dependency on fossil fuels at the expense of renewable energy sources? And if not the energy interests as give you backhanders to parrot their agenda, then who?
  18. How exactly do you expect farmers (especially those from the ranks of the so-called "REAL AmeriKKKans" you and your ilk claim to represent) to "benefit" from farm policies based on your dear lovely Invisible Hand of the Marketplace rather than "wasteful and inefficient" price supports? Can you cite examples from the "here-and-now" of countries where market-based farm policies have actually helped farmers all the more?
  19. How do you expect the government to be financed with taxes at a nil rate, a gold-backed dollar, no central bank to guide monetary policy and the National Debt well over $3 trillion?
  20. What is your view of such among the "poor whites" who call themselves "Confederate Southern Americans" calling for a "natural right to self-determination" to reestablish as a sovereign peculiar the Confederate States of America according to its Civil War-era boundaries, invoking as precedent the Balfour Declaration's right of Jews to establish a "national home" in Palestine based on clear religio-historical precedent?
  21. Are you not aware that you are making a serious ideological mistake in equating Communism, Fascism and Nazism in the same fell swoop when, in fact, they were grossly different ideologically (particularly in terms of economic policy)? (Go look them up in your Funk & Wagnalls if you don't believe me.)
  22. Have you stopped beating your wife?
  23. Have you no sense of Decency, Sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of Decency?
In any case, let's share this with the conservative political element big-big time. (Responsibly, of course.)

"Another small house is finished in the next block"
(to Engrishfy the closing remarks on every episode of the "slice-of-life"
radio series Vic and Sade through the years)

Share

N.B. Leave a comment sign Slambook and/or Guestbook hypothesis. And to bloggers anticipating and followers increased traffic and webmaster, to leverage better, and for the presence of social media, in this respect, have been invited to check out the tools and resources of these valuable masu:


 free web site traffic and promotion SocialClerks Social Exchange

Looking for high-value Webmaster site and his bloggers, said such money blogging resources:

 LinkShare  Referral  Program