icon icon
Find out how you can always remain well-stocked in this respect.
Simply click on the preceding.


19h56 UTC; THURSDAY, 8 JANUARY 2015: Before I begin this post, reader, may I offer my solidarity with the French satiric weekly gazetta Charlie Hebdo, twelve of whose staff members became martyrs to the cause of press freedom, in particular through the agency of satire, in yesterday's Unfortunate Events upon its officies in Paris:

JE SUIS CHARLIE


Now, then, to what I have in mind otherwise: If there's one thing the paleoconservative prolefeeder has among his ur-arsenal of "winning hearts and minds" weaponry targeting in particular the so-called "REAL AmeriKKKans" of limited socioeconomic potential (made even more so, not by all manner of lurid "conspiracies" tending to anti-Semitic canards and patsies as are a paleocon prolefeed staple, but by paleocon policies and articles of faith which, far from "creating jobs" and "empowering the habitually government-dependent," have actually had the opposite effect), it would have to be the use of false or misleading expectations aimed at creating a false sense of uplift and empowerment.

Especially considering where such an agenda paleocons have amounts to a hybrid of the Afrikaner Nationalist agenda down South Africa way prior to World War II which gave root to apartheid (in particular that encapsulated in the Reddingsdaad ["rescue deed" in the Afrikaans] movement and its rallying-cry that of 'n volk red homself, "a people rescues itself") and North Korean Jucheism, especially given their common belief in a "people-centred" approach to socioeconomic empowerment as one with National and Sovereign Unity and Identity of a People and Nation, such best encapsulated in the Afrikaans term Volkseenheid ("natural unity of the people") and its implications for "REAL AmeriKKKans" (poor whites, by and large, mind you) to be expected to rally round this Grand Delusion by way of saccharine-sounding appeals to 'n mensgesenterde ekonomesie vryheid van ons styl ("a people-centred economic freedom of our stylee") being one with the complete and final empowerment of the "chronically- and habitually-dependent upon the State", and such being leveraged unto the Natural and Sovereign Identity of Thy Dear and Lovely Land, so that the two basic concepts are to be viewed as one and the same "by natural right."

Which, unfortunately, raises the question of whether such is deliberately promoting false or misleading hopes and expectations when the "real" paleocon agenda in this respect (one entrusted only to a "Great Within" of such who can be entrusted with truth) is one of perpetuating the same roadblocks as are but preventing the "REAL AmeriKKKan" from achieving the Luscious Glory of their dear lovely ekonomesie vryheid as manifested in jobs creation and training which, in its turn, would translate into a "Christian" socioeconomic paradigm sustaining Thy Dear and Lovely Land from everlasting to everlasting (cf. the Volkskapitalisme ideal of Afrikaner Nationalist leaders in the late 1930's and early 1940's, to be reinforced by mass popular movements such as the Reddingsdaadbond, packaged as Missions from God to Save "REAL AmeriKKKa" From Itself and Secure Its Natural and Divinely-Ordained Right to Socioeconomic Dominion).

So what stands in the way of recognising the obvious, as I have just summarised?

So till next time, folks: "73"

(Which, incidentally, was railroad telegraphers' shorthand for "goodbye.")

Please to share this post all the more:

Preferably through e-mail and/or social media:



Got comments?



Got smartfone?
Then click here to download our free(!!) smartfone app
(as works on both iOS and Android platforms, know)