Can you sense the Logical Interconnexion here?
If not, click it on and see what I mean.

16h UTC; SUNDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2013:
As the AmeriKKKan RepubliKKKan Party goes into what amounts to a very serious decline in its name, prestige and repute thanks to Recent Unfortunate Events as Risked Compromising Our Morally-Superior Socioeconomic Ideal and Paradigm, in its Luscious Glory of an Implied Interconnective Role in the Greater AmeriKKKan Exceptionalist Ideal, perhaps there may be incentive galore for the Real Americans among us (as opposed to the poseurs thereof, made thus by conservative prolefeeders with Delusions of Grandeur rivalled only by the North Korean prolefeed masheen in Beautiful Downtown Pyongyang) to start taking issue with the Greater RepubliKKKan/"Tea Party" ideal of seeing in ekonomesie vryheid met Amerikaanse eienskappe the Glorious Fountainhead of All Our Needs and Wants in Generous and Bountiful Measure.

Especially so Medicare, Medicaid and State Social Security, which the "Tea Party" ideal insists can be better provided for through said ekonomesie vryheid, &c., in Latinoamericano models and stylee expected to be seen as "empowering the working-classes" in such form and fashion as the "failed and failing" State system was incapable of doing ... howbeit unaware that its target audience of the working-masses is incapable of making sound or wise investment decisions in the first place.

And, for another, subscribes to latent canards reeking of anti-Semitism most depraved as insist that Jews have "an unhealthy and disproportionate influence" upon Wall Street "at the expense of Bible-Believing Christians" that a privatised model of State Social Security would theoretically remedy.

Which raises the question of just how would denationalising Social Security would be seen as "Christian" when the profits are held by the fund managers and investment houses to the extent of any potential returns come pensionable age being seriously diluted or compromised to the point of a secure and comfortable retirement being unlikely without any sort of State supplementary benefit (as is the case with the Chilean model endorsed by the more hard-wired True Believers therein).

So what exactly would stand in the way of considering mutually-based pension and savings products and schemes (as in the friendly society movement in Great Britain, represented by the Association of Financial Mutuals as successor to the Association of Friendly Societies) in the debate over the future course of State Social Security? Is it fear, perhaps, that the "REAL AmeriKKKan Workers" will "lose due regard and respect for their proper role and place" in the AmeriKKKan Moral and Socioeconomic Paradigm?

Is it fear that Wall Street "will lose its natural-law rights, privileges and powers traditionally entitled them"?

Or what exactly is the Inherent Fear and Loathing as could ensue out of considering mutuality as a possible way forward to any denationalisation of State Social Security?

"Another small house is finished in the next block"
(to Engrishfy the closing remarks on every episode of the "slice-of-life"
radio series Vic and Sade through the years)


N.B. Leave a comment sign Slambook and/or Guestbook hypothesis. And to bloggers anticipating and followers increased traffic and webmaster, to leverage better, and for the presence of social media, in this respect, have been invited to check out the tools and resources of these valuable masu:

 free web site traffic and promotion SocialClerks Social Exchange

Looking for high-value Webmaster site and his bloggers, said such money blogging resources:

 LinkShare  Referral  Program